The table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and of women working in different occupations. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the weekly wages of men and women on average who working in five different jobs in 2015. Overall, it is clear that men received more salaries than women in all five occupations. Both genders were paid the highest amount of money in the professional field while those who do manual work were paid the lowest among these five professions.
In 2015, professionals got the greatest amount of wages, with $2000 for men and a bit lower for women, at $1900. An opposite trend was seen in the manual laborers' category, who earned almost half of those who had professional skills, at $1100 for male workers and $850 for female workers.
Services and administrative/clerical male staffs received the same amount of salaries, at $1300. However, women employees were paid less than men, which is $950 and $1000 respectively. Male technicians were the second-highest amount of money paid on weekly basis, at $1400, and the third-highest for women, at $900.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laborers'' or 'laborer's'?
Suggestion: laborers'; laborer's
...n opposite trend was seen in the manual laborers category, who earned almost half of tho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92546583851 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03756555838 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2768475902 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127593667892 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724839345815 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836482788897 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905152068225 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065182716094 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.