The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table compares statistics regarding the number of various types of household in UK in 5 different years from 1971 to 2007.
Overall, the families with no children or one person families has experienced a growth in their number while figures for families with children (dependent or Non-dependent) has been decreasing ever since.
one person families and lone parents had experienced a significant growth in number. In 1971 only 6% of families was one person over the following 30 years the figures doubled and in 2001 12% of the families were one person and it stayed 12% until 2007. The percentage for lone parent families was 4% in the year 1971 and it increased dramatically until 2001 which it tripled and stayed 12% over the next 6 years.
The households of couples compare to other families had a mix pattern in proportion. the couples with no children were about one in five of statistics in 1971 while in 2002 they were one in four. couples with dependent children were just more than half OF families (52%) IN 1971 and their proportion went down constantly over the 36 years to 36%i 2007. The proportion of households of couples with non- dependent children was 10% in 1971 and remained almost the same until 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ndent has been decreasing ever since. one person families and lone parents had ex...
^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...milies had a mix pattern in proportion. the couples with no children were about one...
^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Couples
...71 while in 2002 they were one in four. couples with dependent children were just more ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83098591549 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6062301056 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469483568075 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1931893407 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889674782024 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518233489095 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585587049573 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778074307711 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759749004829 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.