The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table compares statistics regarding the number of various types of households in the UK in five different years from 1971 to 2007.
Overall, the families with no children or one person families has experienced a growth in their percentages while figures for families with children (dependent or Non-dependent) has been decreasing ever since.
one person families and lone parents had experienced a significant growth in their number. In 1971 only 6% of families were one person over the following 30 years the figures doubled and in 2001 12% of the families were one person and it stayed 12% until 2007. The percentage for lone parent families was 4% in the year 1971 and it increased dramatically until 2001 which it tripled to 12% did not change over the next 6 years.
The households of couples compare to other families had a mix pattern in proportion. The couples with no children were about one in five of statistics in 1971 while in 2002 they were one in four. couples with dependent children were just more than half OF the families (52%) IN 1971 and their proportion went down constantly over the next 36 years to 36% in 2007. The proportion of households belong to couples with non- dependent children was 10% in 1971 and remained almost the same until 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ndent has been decreasing ever since. one person families and lone parents had ex...
^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cally until 2001 which it tripled to 12% did not change over the next 6 years. ...
^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...milies had a mix pattern in proportion. The couples with no children were about one...
^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Couples
...71 while in 2002 they were one in four. couples with dependent children were just more ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82352941176 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61115379038 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466063348416 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4161745771 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0944315516585 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531480269647 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554528981552 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786362366514 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712634349543 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.