The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.
The deep analysis of the provided table reveals information about that the details of ownership of seven products in Britain during the period of 1972 to 1983.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that the people were interested in purchasing television while, dishwasher was least popular in the last five years.
Looking at the table in more detail, through period central heating was increased to 33 to 64 percent. Although, TV was also widely spread in those years at 93 to 98 percent. Interestingly, from 1979 to 1982 this figure was unchanged with 97 percent. In contrast, Video was not discovered until 1983 and in this year 18 percent of people purchase it. Vacuum cleaner consumer was constantly mounted with 87 to 95 but in 1983 people could not buy it due to some reasons.
Analyzing further, refrigerator consumerism was raised with years. 1972 to 1983, 73 percent to 94 percent jumped. Whereas, Washing machine had 66 percent customer in 1972, at the end of the year this was 80 percent. Similarly, the telephone, 42 percent to 77 percent dramatically raised. Dishwasher was introduced in 1978 with a 3 percent sold and negligible increase in this statistic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ting was increased to 33 to 64 percent. Although, TV was also widely spread in those yea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... negligible increase in this statistic.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96984924623 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73849522126 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633165829146 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.580748453 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4166666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124189456279 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517797487317 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451814316041 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912966325696 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416223076441 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.