The table compare electronic devices used in Britain between 1972 and 1983. Looking more closely to the table, A significant increase trend on using consumer machines is observed.
According to the table, the most popular device in Brittan was television, there was a stability of using television at around 93% in 1972 and 98% in 1983. As well, washing machine, vacuum cleaner and refrigerator usage rose steadily during 12-year period, only vacuum cleaner usage in 1983 was disappeared. However, a considerable increase was found in central heating and telephone by 61% and 35% respectively. Nevertheless, British were just using dishwasher in 1978 and the percentage was less than 5% until 1983. In fact, it was the least popular electronic device in Britain. While, video was just first recorded in 1983 and its first-year usage was not greater than 20%.
In conclusion, there are a considerable increase in every category of electronic devices in Britain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
The table compare electronic devices used in Britain betw...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, well, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29220779221 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86610901287 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6903433662 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083265111863 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431679777657 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429890354507 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688130685294 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369434156037 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.