Table chart expounds the information about imprisonment in five different countries between five decades.
A closer look at illustration reveals that, prison given in Canada was maximum in year 1930 and dramatically decline in following decade. After that, fluctuation could be seen in other years for imprisonment in Canada. Along with this, in united states it was minimum in year 1930 and fluctuated at last became highest during year 1980 accounted to 140 thousand. Moreover in Bew Zealand at starting year it was same as in united states but decreased coming year attributed to 55 thousand. After,1940 it started increasing and reached upto 80 thousand.
Furthermore, in Australia number of imprisonment were 50 thousand in 1930 and initially decreased during year 1940. Additionally, started increasing from year 1950 constituted to 55,000 and became lowest in 1980. Lastly, in Great Britain it was constantly increased upto year 1980 and highest attributed to 80 thousand.
In crux, I concluded that fluctuation could be seen in all five countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ng year 1980 accounted to 140 thousand. Moreover in Bew Zealand at starting year it was ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of imprisonment were 50 thousand in 1930 and initially decreased during y...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... constituted to 55,000 and became lowest in 1980. Lastly, in Great Britain it wa...
^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...,000 and became lowest in 1980. Lastly, in Great Britain it was constantly incre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, lastly, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4156626506 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97117447757 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4762634623 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176939997934 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773486955947 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893409578743 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137618397722 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110945432772 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.