The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
The table compares the numbers of prisoners from 1930 to 1980 in 5 different countries, namely the Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, the United States America and Canada. At a glance, the graph reveals that the imprisonment figure in the USA is the highest among them.
First and foremost, the Great Britain stayed the with the lowest figure at about 30 inmates in 1930 and in gradually increased for the given period reaching over 80 inmates in 1980. Unlike the GB, Canada shows a downward trend. Even though Canada was the region with the highest number of prisoners at approximately 120 prisoners in 1930, it dwindled by about 30 prisoners for the period.
Turning to Australia and USA, both of two countries have the same trend that they fluctuate for the given 5 decades. However, the figures are significantly different. Australia's prisoners remained between 70 and 45 while the figure for USA oscillated between 95 and 135. Last but not least, New Zealand depicts the most considerable change between 1930 and 1940 accounting for a drop by 40 and then it steadily increased for the rest period.
In summary, over 5 decades, the numbers of prisoners in US and GB illustrate an upward trend while in other two countries, they did some progress. Australia had the least number of prisoners which indicates their betterment in law and order.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96052631579 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65160146038 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3923262392 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.818181818 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238649008782 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861893520017 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518079090118 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132115468198 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083299961223 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.