International sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country.
To what extent do you agree to disagree?
It is often said that sports and music transcend cultural, linguistic and religious barriers. People from all around the world water in one space and put their best efforts in pursuit of the same goal and it is considered greatly honourable to be able to offer the stage on which participants compete against each other.
However, costs and other problems involved have invoked a highly contentious issue as to whether being a host country is truly all it is cracked up to be based on cost-benefit analysis. The opponents contend that costs incurred in respect of international sporting events, such as the Olympics far surpass the benefits it provides and therefore, we should not host any games. If we consider the facilities and infrastructure, we must construct in preparation for an event, their contentions are not one which is far-fetched or unreasonable. Especially, we must consider their one-off nature, whereby facilities and infrastructures tend to be used only momentarily when an even is held.
Nevertheless, we must not forget secondary benefits that events entail in addition to what are considered as primary benefits, such as promotional effects. For instance, an event may be a great opportunity for one country to promulgate its cultural or other values it holds, the effects of which are to follow in the long run. It can also be a stage on which political conflicts can be resolved in the name of sportsmanship.
Therefore, we should not overlook the long-term benefits that International events bring when considering the pros and cons. I, personally, am of opinion that hosting counties should welcome nomination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...have invoked a highly contentious issue as to whether being a host country is truly all it is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19172932331 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08603570487 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8805666808 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.545454545 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132501699969 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529673825795 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465282540783 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789863420585 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434308337179 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.