The table below shows the medical care in 3 different countries in the year between 1982 to 2000
The table compares 3 different European nations in terms of medical treatment during the period from 1982 to 2000.
In overall, in terms of the number of physicians provided, there was an upward trend during the whole period, while the oppsite trend was witnessed in the amount of time staying in the hospital. Moreover, although the number of beds allocated in Austria and Sweden decreased significantly, the figure for Sweden saw an increase from 1982 to 2002.
According to the number of doctors, Austria employed the lowest number of specialists in 1982 ,at only 18 thousands. However, this figure then significantly increased in the next 20 years and reached a highest position of 32 thousands in 2002. Likewise, France and Sweden, which started with a higher number of medical employees than Austia,at 19 thousands and 20 thousands each, saw a less remarkable increase than this country in the next period, accounting for only 31 thousands and 30 thousands at the end.
Regarding to the average number of beds provided in the medical facilities, while Austria and Sweden decided to decrease their possessions by 4 thousands and 10 thousands respectively, France was the only nation witnessed an outstanding growth in the next 20-year period.Turning to the length of stay in hospital, Sweden, which accounted for the longest number of days in 1982, also saw the most significant fall to only 6 days in 2002. Although the figures for Austria and France experienced the same trend, both 2 countries shrinked less compared to Sweden.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the lowest number of specialists in 1982 ,at only 18 thousands. However, this figu...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...reased in the next 20 years and reached a highest position of 32 thousands in 200...
^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
... number of medical employees than Austia,at 19 thousands and 20 thousands each, saw...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10276679842 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76410371316 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3744828407 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.444444444 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121343995478 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625397045517 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737674912654 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927240458341 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883612322346 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.