The table illustrates the amount of money spent by an average Australian family on different kind of goods and services in two different years(1991 and 2001)
Overall, the total expenditure increased from 1991 to 2001. The spending were mostly focused on food and other goods and services in bot the years.
In term of food, they spend over 155 dollars in 1991 which was 5 percent lower than that of 2001(160 dollars). For electricity and water, the figure increased the most out of all the categories with over a forty-five dollar increase, reaching over 120 dollars in 2001. The most important expenditure was on other goods and services, having the highest figures of 250$ in 1991 and 270 dollars in 2001.
Meanwhile, housing saw the least difference in their trend with only a five percent increase from 95 to 100 dollars. The rest of the categories, clothing and transport experienced a downward trend. For transport, the figures dropped down from from 70 to 45 dollars. Clothing was the spent the lowest out of all the categories at only 30 dollars in 1991 and 200 dollars on the other years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
...services, having the highest figures of 250$ in 1991 and 270 dollars in 2001. Mea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...For transport, the figures dropped down from from 70 to 45 dollars. Clothing was the spen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57297403859 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1408831906 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113022949664 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449879078582 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719422604552 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865907194773 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595138605694 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.