the table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006.
The tabular data depicts how many people worked in 4 certain divisions in the UK in 1998 and 2006. The data is structured in five groups based on age from 18 to 65 years old.
First of all, in the initial year, the major proportion of young people (over 100,000) preferred to work in the building sector which kept on decreasing with age group. The figures for this sector in 2006 had fewer workers overall in 2006 though it retained a similar age profile to that of 1998. Similarly, in hotel and catering, the age profile of workers used to be much younger in 1998, with the majority of workers being under 35. In 2006, the majority of workers were between 26 and 45, with more workers in the over-46 category ( four thousand more in each category) than in 1998 and fewer in under 25s.
Whereas the other 2 work areas had either a fluctuating or an increasing trend. Amongst them, the technology industry has seen an enormous change with substantially more workers now than in 1998, but the vast majority of these were still in the 26-35 age band which were under 65,000 and around 450,000 respectively). The numbers in education have not changed that much within each age category, although there are now fewer workers in the over-56 age group with a difference of over 20,000 which became half.
Overall, it can be seen that hotel and catering as well as building had dropped in the latter stages and also in 2006. Whereas middle-aged people were mostly preferring to work in the technology and education field with the overall highest figures seen for technology for the 26-35 age group.
- In some countries people move abroad for their work They have to leave their family and friends Do you think benefits of this outweighs drawbacks 95
- The graph below shows the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 89
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates aged 20 24 in one European country over a two year period 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion of young people over 100,000 preferred to work in the building sector...
^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith more workers in the over-46 category four thousand more in each category than...
^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lso in 2006. Whereas middle-aged people were mostly preferring to work in the technology and education...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, still, well, whereas, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68327402135 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37217376444 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53024911032 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5976595022 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291872636458 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119976398971 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777993059035 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19021109048 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060461991391 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion of young people over 100,000 preferred to work in the building sector...
^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith more workers in the over-46 category four thousand more in each category than...
^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lso in 2006. Whereas middle-aged people were mostly preferring to work in the technology and education...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, still, well, whereas, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68327402135 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37217376444 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53024911032 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5976595022 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291872636458 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119976398971 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777993059035 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19021109048 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060461991391 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.