the table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006.
The given table compares the quantity of workforce depends on five periods of time in four main fields, through two selected years 1998 and 2006.
As can be seen from the table, the sector of technology seems to attract most of the human sources in working ages.
Regarding hotel services, the major of young people, exactly under 35 years old tend to work in hotel and catering. In detail, this data was estimated at approximately 26,000 people and witnessed a slight decrease in the other ages. Likewise, in building, most of younger people engaged in this field was shown in 1998, with the majorities of worker being under 25 years old and get fewer in 2006.
In the contrary, it is evident that the two left sectors experienced a fluctuation and increasing trend. Particularly, the technology industry has seen considerably went up with more workers than in 1998, but most of them were measured in the 26-35 age level which were the highest number at nearly 450,000 people. The amount of workforce in education have not changed that much within surveyed ages, although there are fewer workers in the 56- age group and reported to exactly 23,000 people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, likewise, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86868686869 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49257646931 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651515151515 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0775925628 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179030815589 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673574581423 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249125343253 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096511352828 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013203252793 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.