The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table represent the total number of people who visited Ashdown Museum before the renovation took place and after it, while two pie charts depict the breakdown of the grade to which the visitors were satisfied with the museum facilities, snapshotting information at the same two years.
As could be seen from the table, the amount of visitors significantly increased as a result of fulfilled refurbishment process. Moreover, the level of satisfaction spiked greatly, from only 15 people being very pleased with the services provided before the museum was refurbished to 35 visitors after the renovation.
As for details, the numbers of visitors during the year before modifications amounted to 74 thousand and it reached 92 thousand visitors the year after. In addition to this positive trend, one can noticed that 40 people were dissatisfied previously, but this number decreased more then 2.5 times after the redecoration was ended.
The ratio of people who were very dissatisfied and showed no response did not changed significantly over the span of two years and decreased only by 5 visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'represents'.
Suggestion: represents
The table represent the total number of people who visited ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...viously, but this number decreased more then 2.5 times after the redecoration was en...
^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...atisfied and showed no response did not changed significantly over the span of two year...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years and decreased only by 5 visitors.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, then, while, as for, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89952177632 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638418079096 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1807798126 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407678322721 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170833917142 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853680859567 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207283767286 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624896938327 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.