The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of the surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table given gives information about how many people visiting the Ashdown Museum within 2 years, before and after its restoration and the pie charts illustrate the percentage of visitors asked about their satisfaction level in the same two periods.
Overall, there was a considerable increase in the total quantity of visitors after refurbishment. Furthermore, their satisfaction level also rose significantly, witnessed by the increasing satisfaction level after that.
Particularly, the numbers of people setting foot in this museum climbed by 18000, from 74000 before and 92000 after refurbishment. These increase helped museum take a sanguine view of visitors' satisfaction with their trip when the proportion of those who felt very satisfied and satisfy after revamp went up greatly.
Before the renovation, the figure for the first rate criteria which was very satisfied just accounted for 15%, the more than doubled to 35% later, while the numbers for the second were 30% and 40% respectively. Meanwhile, an inverse trend in the ratio of visitors feeling dissatisfied and very dissatisfied after refurbishment underwent when just 15% and 5% of those who opined that although the previous figures were up 40% and 10%, accordingly. Eventually, the number of guests having no response stayed static during the surveyed period, with just 5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46889952153 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96812735506 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.830889488 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.875 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311158003515 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120869421321 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610887856379 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170284972994 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542286034592 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.