The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The two given tables show how much money spent on Fairtrade coffee and banana in two separate years 1999 and 2004 in five nations of European.
Overall, sale of those goods most increase between two years, except for the number of bananas in Sweden and Denmark. Another key figure is that Switzerland and the UK were the highest level of these two products respectively.
In 1999, the revenue of Fairtrade coffee in Switzerland stood at 3 millions, followed by around 1.5 million and 1.8 million euros in the UK and Denmark accordingly. The lower figures were recorded in Belgium and Sweden at that time, with 1 million and 0.8 million euros in the order. After five years, the coffee sales in the UK saw a dramatic increase and reached a peak at 20 million euros while this figure in Switzerland witnessed a double increse from 3 to 6 million euros. The other data climbed by about 0.2 to 0.7 million euros.
Meanwhile, the number of Fairtrade bananas in Switzerland hold always the top rank recorded 15 million euros in 1999 which rose threefold after five years. This figure in the UK and Belgium rose quite negligibly from 1 to 0.6 million by comparison with 5.5 and 4 million euros, respectively. However, there was an inverse trend in the sale of banana in Sweden and Denmark, with 1.8 and 2 million euros in 1999 before going down 1 and 0.9 million euros in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'hold'.
Suggestion: always hold
...ber of Fairtrade bananas in Switzerland hold always the top rank recorded 15 million euros ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66255144033 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47843926286 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522633744856 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4411854911 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190645644977 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861882377789 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840589682747 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14230375522 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924690539483 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.