The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows the number of people who visited to Ashdown Museum in the year before the redecoration and in the year after this. The pie charts provide data on results of surveys which provide information about people how much satisfied before and after the redecoration.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of people who visited to Ashdown Museum rose significantly and the rate of satisfaction showed a similar trend. It increased enormously.
Looking at the table in more detail, it is clear that Ashton Museum visitors was 74,000 people before the year of redecoration. By the year after the redecoration, this figure had increased to 92,000 people.
Turning to the pie charts, it is evident that the rate of satisfaction increased after the redecoration. The percentage of people who are dissatisfied plunged from 40% in the year before redecoration to 15% in the year after redecoration.The percentage of satisfied visitors and very satisfied visitors showed a similar trend. The former increased from 30% to 40% and the latter rose from 15% to 35%. 10% of visitors replied to survey as very dissatisfied in the year before the redecoration but this figure declined to 5%. The percentage of visitors who didn't join the survey remained unchanged between the year before redecoration and the year after redecoration, 5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, may, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62688669173 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502793296089 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7516180459 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0227423571145 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.012084669208 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0188012253879 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0127772315501 0.15604864568 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127609431461 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.