The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours.
The tabular chart contrasts the feedback of males and females about the satisfaction level of the services provided by the city sports club. The spectacular feature of the chart is the gratification of females with the opening hours of the club.
As is observed from the graph, more than half of the males were very glad by the range of activities the club offered while only a small proportion was disappointed. However, a little bit more than the one-third of females were highly satisfied and satisfied whereas only third-tent were upset from the concerned. Moreover, almost equal number of male and females were pleased with the facilities of the club. On the contrary, 4% more females were downhearted by the club facilities as compared to the males.
Moving further, Opening hours meet the expectations of a slightly less than the third-forth of females but only 44% males were very satisfied by the same. In addition, the majority of males were discouraged with the provision of timings.
Overall, maximum females were more happy with each aspect of the club than the males.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...proportion was disappointed. However, a little bit more than the one-third of females were...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, third, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02762430939 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68073676869 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502762430939 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4282195209 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129385438536 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738028956264 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056471395335 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915282866415 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623694443352 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.