The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
The table compares UN’s data on four countries in terms of four social and economic indicators in 1994.
Overall, it can be seen that the data on Canada and Japan were much higher than those of Peru and Zaire. Moreover, the figures for the four indicators in Zaire were the lowest among the four countries.
In Canada, annual income per person was 11100 US dollars. The figure for Japan was considerably higher, at 15760. The life expectancies at birth of the two countries were almost the same, at 76 years and 78 years for Canada and Japan respectively. In terms of daily calorie supply per person, the figure for Canada was higher than that of Japan, at 3326 compared to 2846. Finally, the adult literacy rates in both countries were the same at 99%.
By contrast, all the data on Peru and Zaire were much lower than that on Canada and Japan. In terms of annual income per person, the figures for Peru and Zaire were 160 and 130 US dollars respectively, only about 1/100 of the figure for Japan. Life expectancies for both countries were around 50 years. Daily calorie supple per person in Peru was 1927, slightly higher than that of Zaire, whose figure was 1749. In Peru, about 68% of the adults were literate, two-third of the figure for Canada and Japan. Zaire had the lowest literacy rate of 34%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65665236052 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27287968423 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459227467811 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0861213209 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150123699506 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686506132184 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101928011277 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157555076648 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137564244795 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.