Base on United Nations statistics, the four social and economic measurements for four countries in 1994 were illustrated on the table. \
Overall, it is clear that all indicators of Canada and Japan were significantly higher than the figures for Peru and Zaire.
As can be seen from the table, the average annual income of Japan($US15760) were the biggest, followed by Canada($US11100). Similarly, life expectancy at birth of Japan was also the highest(78 years), and the second most was Canada(76 years). By contrast, Canada had the biggest average daily calorie consumption, accounting for 3326 calories, followed by Japan with 2846 calories, while adults literacy rate of both nations were the highest and similar to each other(99%).
At the other extreme, all four indicators of Peru were significantly higher than those of Zaire. Both annual income per individual measurement of Peru($US160) and Zaire($US130) were approximately one percent of that of Japan. Peru and Zaire had the same life expectancy at birth, which were around 50 years. Individual daily calorie of Zaire(1749 calories) was a half of that of Canada. Finally, adults literacy rate of Zaire was a half of Peru and about one third of the figure for Canada and Japan, representing 34%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for Canada and Japan, representing 34%.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, second, similarly, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08457711443 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.675503282 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5784425527 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152430954894 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736899393683 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142944241032 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16106971256 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191869608813 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.