The table compares the amount of water used for three different purposed by six nations in 2001. Overall, China used hefty amounts of water compared to other nations.
Firstly, Australia and Canada topped the charts with 341 and 279 cubic meter of water utilisation for domestic purpose. Next comes, Russia and Turkey with 98 and 80 m3 of water usage. UK and China utilised minimum amount of water, accountably 38 and 26 m3 water respectively.
Regarding agriculture sector, Russia and Turkey used 1663 and 1462m3 of water, which is the largest among these nations. Canada also used1238m3 of water. The three remaining nations ranked least with utilisation in the range of 605m3 to 810m3. With regard to industrial sector, Turkey utilised 731m3 of water, followed by Canada with 398m3 of water usage. Australia and Uk utilised 275 and 398m3 of water for industrial purpose. On the other hand, China and Russia used the least amount of water for industrial usage, 71 and 96m3 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...opped the charts with 341 and 279 cubic meter of water utilisation for domestic purpo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06707317073 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50237097564 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3476440523 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5454545455 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144063371665 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702761239271 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804759316813 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123119961035 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063374391176 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.