The table demonstrates the results of three surveys conducted in a specific university in different time span in terms of pupils perspective regarding diverse sectors of the university.
The table demonstrates the results of three surveys conducted in a specific university in different time span in terms of pupils perspective regarding diverse sectors of the university.
Overall, with the exception of the range of modules offered which shrunk progressively, other sections almost achieved a higher students approval at the end of the period.
Looking at electronic resources and teaching quality it is crystal clear that they experienced a considerable rise reaching from 45 in 2000 to 88 in 2010 and 65 in 2000 to 69 in 2010 respectively. Conversely, the range of offered modules followed a different trend constituting 32 in 2000 and 27 in 2010. Print resources, despite facing some fluctuations, reached 1% higher in 2010 with 88 compared with 87 in 2000. Also, the rate of building/teaching facilities remained static in all three years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-29 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 56 | view |
- It is true to say that in the new millennium people pay too much attention to monetary things 89
- The two layouts demonstrate the changes which had happened in road access to a city hospital by 2010. 67
- The illustration demonstrates the various stages undertaken in order to produce leather products. 78
- The line graph compares the rate of burglary, car theft, and robbery in Newport city over the course of nine years. 73
- The bar chart compares the volume of rentals and sales of films over the course of a decade in a specific shop. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...se sectors of the university. Overall, with the exception of the range of modules offered which shru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...other sections almost achieved a higher students approval at the end of the period. Loo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, look, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 725.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25362318841 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24026501544 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6936939259 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28851332926 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179152027621 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.36747780121 0.0843802449381 436% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341910309353 0.15604864568 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.46545823362 0.0819641961636 568% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.