The table describes the changes of people in millions who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
The table illustrates the number of people who traveled abroad in 5 different nations over the period of 25 years starting from 1990.
Overall, it is evident that all five areas witnessed an upward trend in the quantity of foreign visitors, with Europe and the Asia Pacific recording the highest growth. Another noteworthy feature includes the fact that Europe was the most ubiquitous destination for international travelers.
In 1990, the total number of tourists accounted for 464.8M, in which half of them decided to choose Europe to explore. In the second position, America had been visited by 93M persons, surpassing the number for Asia and the Pacific by 26M. Far below were Africa and the Middle East with just about 15M and 9.6M visitors respectively.
Subsequently, the entire variety of visitors increased to 704.3M in 2005, indicating an increase of approximately 240M. During the period shown, Europe always ranked first, soaring to shy of 400M international voyagers. The figure for Asia and the Pacific was doubled to 135.8M, giving it the second-place finish. Africa and the Middle East mirrored the upward shift despite modest increases to 28.3M and 27M respectively in 2005. The last country, America, peaked with 118.2M visitors in 2000 albeit with a slight decline to precisely 113M five years after.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21126760563 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67825459502 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643192488263 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0594158761 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.909090909 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158330688459 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052922088557 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529354561529 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992863425865 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608035681919 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.