The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. (million).
The graph highlights the number of global travellers in four years in five different regions, namely Africa, America, Asia and the Pacific, Europe and the Middle West.
Overall, there was a total increase in the number of people going on international trips, with Europeans being virtually the largest proportion among visitors. It is also noticeable that American tourists are prone to less overseas travelling over the period shown.
Regarding travellers from Europe, the number started at 280,2 millions in 1990, followed by a moderate rise of approximately 110 millions in the next 10 years before ending the period at 400,2 millions, which was the greatest figure in 2005. Inversely, the number of American visitors witnessed a dramatic fall from 680,5 millions, the highest compared to others in the year of 1990, to just 113,2 millions in 2005.
As for Asia and the Pacific, 60,2 millions was the proportion of people who went abroad in 1990, with a subsequent growth to 135,8 millions at the end of the given period. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, can be seen in Africa and the Middle West, whose numbers of global commuters grew from 18,2 millions to 28,7 millions and 9,8 millions to 15,8 millions respectively. The proportion of all travellers experienced a significant rise to 615,2 millions in 1995, after which it continued to increase gradually to a total of 693,7 millions in 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09012875536 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70811029531 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570815450644 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.3247075005 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272296649979 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113901882562 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673673216447 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137591302611 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939990117114 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.