Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is universally argued that whether group study or self - study has more immense effects on students’ learning process. Although I acknowledge the drawbacks and benefits of both viewpoints, I believe that for students to study efficiently, studying with others is essential.
Admittedly, there are good reasons to say that students can study better on their own. Chief of these is that while studying alone, learners are capable of avoiding external distraction which stems from social interactions and verbal confabulation. Only then would they be able to focus more on their material especially when preparing for the exam. Added to this is the fact that through self - study, sole learners can be flexible with their schedules. Independent students can cover the material at their own pace, meaning that revision and further practices are available at any time. Therefore, many pupils are shown to have better academic performances after being given time for self - study at home.
However, there are stronger reasons to believe that the positive benefits of group study can outweigh that of studying alone. With the aid from members of the team, students can prevent procrastination, given that they would motivate each other as more people would create the atmosphere encouraging education. Moreover, joining academic groups with classmates could enhance critical thinking as well as creativity. Since they can have a grasp on other’s knowledge and perspectives, they can look into these alternative viewpoints and gain better understanding of each one, therefore can further their learning. This would benefit the students in class performance ultimately.
In conclusion, even though self - study could be regarded as a suitable way to study as it somewhat creates the sense of convenience, studying in a team is more effective considering the development of individuals
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | kwchung | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should be encouraged to learn vocational skills more To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should be encouraged to learn vocational skills more To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...e immense effects on students’ learning process. Although I acknowledge the drawbacks a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46575342466 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93134243038 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7910253035 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319708581001 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116801022438 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858027055513 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217486072206 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913275744529 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.