Nowadays most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should be encouraged to learn vocational skills more. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is frequently asserted that vocational training should be prompted in higher education rather than academic skills. I personally think that there is little to disagree with in this school of thought for some justifications.
Granted, some may argue that students are to learn scholastic study during the period of university and college. This is predicated on the assumption that in the world of materialism, which value socioeconomic status above all, the only possible way to gain credibility and become wealthy is by taking on academic study that can provide students with not only professional knowledge on the subject but opportunities for career development, therefore, theoretical courses are of great importance. However, this line of reasoning is not sound as focusing on vocational skills can helps learners secure well-paid jobs more quickly than those with academic qualifications. This can be seen in the way many recruiters are in favor of alumni from practice-oriented programs as they have attained experiences. Such exposure would give them a head start over others, ensuring resounding successes for students.
There are other reasons to advocate vocational training in universities. Chief of these is that by encouraging these programs, it would aid to waive the imbalance in the labour market. As students are leaning towards studying academically, some jobs have become unreasonably appealing, meaning that the acceptance rate would be increasingly high, which results in unemployment among students with diplomas. These may include positions that involve undemanding tasks and favorable work environments such as office workers in a business setting. In addition, other jobs, for example, nursing and crafting would become less popular and undesirable. This could lead to potential shortage of labour, affecting the economy perniciously in the long run.
In conclusion, vocational lessons in university should be fostered for the sake of individuals and the country as a whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60327868852 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12852864471 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616393442623 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1729977574 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176323713597 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573643205748 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480525423795 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113394224452 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294766971927 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.