The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)
2005 Present 2025
Hamburgers 40 38 51
Fried Chicken 35 37 45
Salads 5 15 41
Fried Rice 6 9 9
Noodles 6 8 9
You should write at least 150 words.
The table illustrates, the average amount of junk food consumed by people is divided into 5 categories (Hamburgers, Fried Chicken, salads, Fried rice and Noodles) in Melbourne. It’s between the years of 2005 – 2025. The units are measured in numbers.
Overall, the junk foods eaten by people like Hamburgers has increasing value and predicted to reach top of the list by year 2025, Whereas Fried chicken is at second to hamburgers also having increment. Meanwhile, Consumers eating healthy foods like salads has gradual increment, “which would reach nearer the foods top on the list”. Finally, Foods like Fried rice as well as Noodles has the least amount.
In terms of, Hamburgers it’s on top of the list having 40 units, and predicted to reach 51 units by 2025. Meanwhile, Consumption of oily foods like Fried Chicken is having values nearer to hamburgers it is 35 and 45.
On the other hand, Healthy foods like salads is having least amount of 5 units in year of 2005, but by observing, it will have gradual increasing value around 41 by 2025. Finally, Fried rice and Noodles Ranks low on the list, while both having fluctuating values of 1 unit (6 – 9).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increasing value and predicted to reach top of the list by year 2025, Whereas Fr...
^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the least'.
Suggestion: having the least
...ther hand, Healthy foods like salads is having least amount of 5 units in year of 2005, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, second, so, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8855721393 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58989512213 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517412935323 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.053180866 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13279844179 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063350942048 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039224764593 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945291749185 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335255114479 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.