The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98.
The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.
The above table illustrates, number of people traveling to various countries based on purpose between the periods of 1994-1998. It is divided into four sub-categories: holiday, business, visits to friends and relatives and other reasons. Second diagram depict, citizens of UK visiting distinct continents.
To summarize, number of tourists are traveling to different parts of the world on the basis of holiday which is increasing gradually in year of 1994-1998. Meanwhile, traveling for unknown reasons is fluctuating. Whereas, backpackers traveling to North America as well as other areas has ranked low which has identical value. However, there is popularity for Western Europe has risen dramatically.
Firstly, we can observe there is increasing value for holidays where citizens of UK travel various parts of the globe from 1994 (15,246) to 1998 (20,700). In addition, people traveling for other purpose have least value (982-990) in year of 1994 and 1998 over other category.
Secondly, people visiting Western side of Europe nations are escalating considerably in period of 1994 to 1998 having value 19000 – 24000. Next is North America, other areas like Asia having fewer tourists from Britain which has similar values throughout all the periods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the least'.
Suggestion: have the least
...ion, people traveling for other purpose have least value 982-990 in year of 1994 and 1998 ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4793814433 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76342989734 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3370677461 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6363636364 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167964353219 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687207221557 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429464702041 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106344452846 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261610945265 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.