Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Essay topics:

Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some people argue that studying about our history in current time has no value which I live in. I totally disagree with the above statement because learning from the past has a lot of benefits like innovation, overcoming mistakes.
The main reason is we learn from past discoveries. Our previous scientist has invented a lot of devices which would benefit the humankind and with the help of these past data researchers can make future inventions for instance; take telephone, in the past it was used only for communication but it has changed a lot. Help of past knowledge researchers has added a lot of features to handheld device where one could access the while globe. Meanwhile, they are also developing 5G technology for faster access.
Second reason is past history world was. In the past there were conflicts due to misunderstanding between countries. However, it has changed by learning from past history for example; because of world wars there was a lot of human loss and waste of food resources but it is changing thanks to past knowledge. These days, nations are trying to avoid the conflict and keeping the world peace.
In conclusion, although learning from past experience has no benefit in current era. I believe that past histories has a value which would help the people to overcome their mistakes as well as helping the scientists to make future innovations which will be helpful.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... In conclusion, although learning from past experience has no benefit in current era. I believ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96186440678 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70303116477 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580508474576 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9483298366 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5833333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191772621618 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780814685479 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427499764256 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12107659246 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225444453427 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.