Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words
Learning is a continuous process. It is believed by some people that seeking knowledge about the times past has no relevance to today's world. I somewhat disagree with this assertion with reasons that will be analysed in this essay.
On the one hand, some people believe studying about the is irrelevant because conventional practices are harmful. It is imperative to understand that some of these practices such as female genital mutilations, forced early marriage, marriage by abduction do not only devoid people of their rights, it as well endangers their lives and predisposes them to infections. To illustrate, sixty-five percent of circumcised females get infected after a week while thirty-five percent are at risk of infection later in life as revealed in the research carried out by Advocate for girls right in 2017.
On the other hand, information about the past is of benefit to the society because it helps in decisions making and solving problems. In other words, it enables us to learn from the actions taken by our forefathers during socioeconomic adversaries. Also, this prevents us from repeating the mistakes made by them. Futhermore, it acquaints us about how we evolve. Is history keeping of any value? Certainly yes, it provides informations about how things done in the past, the progress made from the new inventions, and can be use to evaluate the growth of the nation. Thus, the merits of history cannot be overemphasized.
In conclusion, although some of the traditional practices are preposterous, i partially disagree that historical learning is insignificant because it guides decision making during socioeconomic crisis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... females get infected after a week while thirty-five percent are at risk of infec...
^^
Line 15, column 527, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ade from the new inventions, and can be use to evaluate the growth of the nation. T...
^^^
Line 15, column 527, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ade from the new inventions, and can be use to evaluate the growth of the nation. T...
^^^
Line 21, column 25, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...sized. In conclusion, although some of the traditional practices are preposterous,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37642585551 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02769054428 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1090531297 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156807526369 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513948305379 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293535582945 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832870790444 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382781032695 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.