The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.
This chart shows the results of a survey that sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98. There are data analyze for this chart.
There are too many changed between 1994 to 1998. In total summary is increased year by year. Just only it is decreased in 1995. There are four reasons for abroad. It is the main for the holiday, From 15,246 to 20,700 people. Following by Business, it is from 3,155 to 3,957. For visits to friends and relatives is from 2,689 to 3,181. In other reasons are from 982 to 990. There are some differences with others here. There is something was happened in 1995. Most of the reasons are declined in 1995 compared with last year. It might due to government policy make other reasons was reduced in 1998. Many people are refused by a visa in 1998.
From the second chart, we can find there is something change in 1995. It might mean there have some police changes and fewer people can go to Western Europe. Views from the whole we can find it tends to increase.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51813471503 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19067455552 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5075319951 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 48.4444444444 112.824112599 43% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.7222222222 22.9334400587 47% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269789656064 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673528182408 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17268208559 0.0843802449381 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25442564973 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.294612269435 0.0819641961636 359% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.2 13.2329268293 39% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.71 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.7 10.3012195122 36% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.75 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.4329268293 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.