The statement claims that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference. I strongly disagree with this statement. There are some reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, it claims that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. As an individual, it is only for one person, if only you plant the tree, if only you throw away the rubbish, these won’t be so obvious. Because the power of common people is very small.
Secondly, this statement claims that only governments and large companies can make a difference. I disagree with this opinion. If as an individual we cannot do the demanding of the government, and the government will cannot make a difference. As a large company, it is less effective compared with the government.
Thirdly, there are so many stories about individuals and the government. Our country has a department that is a small community. It has connected parts of the district and manages this part. The community always does some actions to improve the environment. Some students are always particular into the community to help to improve the environment. In fact, most students fail. They are required all residents save the water, save the electronic, and cannot spit on the ground, cannot peeing on the ground or lawn and only go to washroom. All of these failed after three months. An important point is these residents all think even if they do not do it, someone else does it, they think the individuals cannot improve the environment.
To sum up, they are both important to improve the environment. Only one person finished it, others can also do it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the rubbish, these won’t be so obvious. Because the power of common people is very smal...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in fact, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97153024911 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86287375715 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491103202847 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8313337386 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.5238095238 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.380952381 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369422723952 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100372166361 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138300487718 0.0667982634062 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247952599192 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112357287184 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.