The statement offered two views included some people think the government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people, others think that government funding of art threatens the integrity of the art. I strongly believe that government funding should be given to the arts. As an artist, I can give some reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, most people choose to support art, it has deep meaning in history. When we study history in our country, usually we can find some paintings in history textbooks. Art always shows real historical facts. In ancient China, the emperor wanted to know what Han xizai was doing and the painter went to look for Han xizai, then paint this case for the emperor. From here, we can get the clothes, the game and their make up from the South Tang Dynasty.
Secondly, we should more protect the arts and support artists from our country. A famous painter Van Gogh, he never gained support and was very poor. Finally, he died at only 37 years old. It also means France and the Netherlands lost a great painter and lost more works that might exist and disappear in the future.
Thirdly, it will better to protect the arts in architecture when the government chooses to fund art. Too many historic architectures and paintings were destroyed in the war. In China, many handicraft arts have disappeared, grandparents want to teach their granddaughters and grandsons but these children do not want to learn it in the modern world.
Finally, some people think government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the art. Funding of the country will affect people’s attention, if the government only has less money, it will make some artists lost enthusiastic to creative. If the government always holds on to the competition for any form of art, it will prevent some artists from feeling discouraged.
To sum up, only reasonably arrange for this funding, it is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58763780073 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9514461178 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1578947368 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519496825397 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156229680334 0.0831039109588 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186462435993 0.0758088955206 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279375262527 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199482206026 0.0667264976115 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58763780073 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9514461178 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1578947368 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519496825397 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156229680334 0.0831039109588 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186462435993 0.0758088955206 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279375262527 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199482206026 0.0667264976115 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.