Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Sociality should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. I disagree with this statement. There are some reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, one of the non-human activities such as panda. They are from the times of dinosaurs. They are cross with black and white and look very cute. It is never affected by humans. Humans saved them from extinction. These pandas only eat bamboo, they are very lazy to move, just koalas are lazier than pandas. They enjoy playing and who do not know how to fight against natural enemies. They are not only cute, they are priceless in studies. As they have existed since ancient times, they have too many secrets. If society makes efforts to save endangered species only when they extinction of the result of human activities, these will be late to do. The panda will be really extinct.
Secondly, any animal extinction will decrease the life diversity, even if it will affect the food cycle. It will make some species lose their natural enemies, make them overgrow or even flood. It is very awful when they have too many. Such as the fire ant from South America. When they come to Florida and Texas or other places, it causes huge destruction. There might be other chain reactions that make other animals go reactions that make other animals go to extinction. Some ferocious animals lost their food and it might also make them extinct.
Finally, in fact, people find it hard to tell which ones are caused by humans. Human activities almost affected all the environment of the earth.
To sum up, although it should be discussed whether all extinct animals should be protected, the impact of human activities on nature should be minimized and the damaged environment should be appropriately restored. We should protect any endangered no matter what causes the potential extinction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, in fact, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93188854489 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46662779936 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538699690402 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7197507183 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.72 118.986275619 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.92 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.12 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226374833645 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061229003076 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10048957804 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152189134073 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112096717398 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.