The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
There are changes from 2007 to 2010 in the City Hospital area. These changes are designed for traffic jams and make car stream became to scatter. There are some changes in the following paragraph.
This is a ring road around the city hospital in the North and it is no change with 2010. In the South with the ring road is Hospital Road, two sides are three bus stops and easy to wait for the buses. Right the Hospital Road is a car park use for staff and public. In 2010, the car park on Hospital Road is only for staff and the public car park is removed to the right side of City Hospital. The six bus stops are disappeared and removed to the bus station, where on the left with Hospital Road. The crossroads of Ring Road and Hospital Road, City Road and Hospital Road become the roundabouts. It means the amounts of cars are more than before and make traffic congestion. These roundabouts can dredge the vehicle and increase the distance between two cars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42372881356 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17160913601 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480225988701 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8007506126 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.1818181818 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.181818181818 5.23603664747 3% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2389551938 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101670937796 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689996345459 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172541747072 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528985479769 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.2329268293 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.