Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev

This statement claims that competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education. I can analyze it from different angles. The grade may limit some things and have so many effects but it is still a nice way for someone to advertise.
First of all, students only focus on their grades. People always spend overnight learning in China and South Korea, etc. My cousin just entered university. Only three months ago, he always wrote his homework at midnight, even if it was 2 o’clock. When his father hoped he would go to bed and ask for him, he said, if I was to give up this homework, my teacher would punish me for writing these over 50 times. It will be more awful. If a certain student has a terrible grade, they need to memorize some templates and ways of solving questions. They also write too many different questions and get higher scores. These teachers think it will help their students receive an offer from a university with a higher ranking. But it limits the quality of learning at all levels of education. People learn only from great schools but not from ideals.
Secondly, the grade is an objective standard. People’s grades are the main way to restrict their study. Although I want to learn by myself completely, their inertia makes it hard to realize. If they want to have a good grade, they should learn hard to gain a satisfactory grade.
Finally, higher grade are Grades intuitively show everyone's strengths. It may be an encouragement rather than a limitation. Someone’s grade become a factor make professor or company choose you. Most of famous people are graduation from a good university such as Harvard University or MIT.
To sum up, it is better standard to judge your ability current. If it will have better standard than today.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 563, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... solving questions. They also write too many different questions and get higher scores. These ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...standard to judge your ability current. If it will have better standard than today...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, as to, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77635782748 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56640417734 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613418530351 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4628308043 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.2916666667 118.986275619 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0416666667 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212008467834 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543939378632 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835343994441 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110263065811 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832717309875 0.0667264976115 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 14.1392134831 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 563, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... solving questions. They also write too many different questions and get higher scores. These ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...standard to judge your ability current. If it will have better standard than today...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, as to, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77635782748 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56640417734 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613418530351 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4628308043 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.2916666667 118.986275619 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0416666667 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212008467834 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543939378632 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835343994441 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110263065811 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832717309875 0.0667264976115 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 14.1392134831 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.