Claim: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's major field of study.
Reason: Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The statement claims that Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study. This think is true and has a bit wrong. We should think about it with fact circumstance.
First of all, it is better relate with your study field or your interest. This action can get students more chance to find their job. If you are an accountant , you better to study computer code, python etc, it will help you save your time. If you are chemistry major you can take biology and to learn some biochemistry field knowledges. My major is fine art, this major can only become a painter or a teacher. I have been gave a chance to learn UI & UX design, it means I have more choices for it. I can try to become a designer and I will get more job to choose.
Secondly, students can also learn critical thinking ability in outside. Your speech will get interviewer’s appreciate and it will very important in your career. You will make more friends, cooperation with your colleagues and work better each other. It will make you enjoy your life.
Thirdly, cross subjects will give you potential creative. People invented radar because bats, people invented plane because birds. There are too many studies are interdisciplinary.
Finally, it also has some negative effects such as if these courses are useless, it will make students waste time. Even if give students more burden. If these students do not know how to reasonably to distribute time, it will make them waste time both two sides and fail with two sides. If students know how to distribute their time, these burdens are worth. After all, these are sever to look for their jobs.
To sum up, I partly to support this statement. It has too many benefits to students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...find their job. If you are an accountant , you better to study computer code, pyth...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...ome a painter or a teacher. I have been gave a chance to learn UI & UX design, it me...
^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...less, it will make students waste time. Even if give students more burden. If these stu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, after all, as to, of course, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76298701299 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61144722476 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555194805195 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 6.24550561798 336% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5740302274 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.125 118.986275619 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8333333333 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160877143286 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482662453724 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985500349927 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879129680506 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115275034582 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 14.1392134831 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.44 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.