The given table compares the modifications of the proportion’s different transport usages surveyed by the inhabitants in Australia in specific 3 years 2010, 2012 and 2014.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that the most popular kind of private transport is referred to passenger vehicles, whereas the four existing ones are far lower thant that but all show an upward trend in the number of Australian travellers from the year 2010 to 2014.
Looking at the information of the table, it can be clear that passenger vehicles have made up the highest proportion since 2010 from 11 million vehicles to 13 million ones in 2014, showing an average change around 18.2%. This was followed by the number of commercial vehicles less than roughly 5 times in the year 2010, 2012 and 2014 with 2,3 million, 2,6 million and 2,7 million vehicles respectively, witnessing a little lower percentage fluctuation at 17.4%.
As regards three remaining categories of vehicles, the motorcycles saw the most noticeable change in the percentage with a peak to 30.7%, but it stood the average position in terms of the number rising remarkably from 570,000 in 2010 to 745,000 vehicles in 2014. In addition, the pattern for heavy trucks and light trucks was slightly similar to the aforementioned popular trend with respective percentages being around 10.2% and 23.5%. Although the heavy trucks shifted more slightly towards the increase in the vehicle users, the light trucks experienced the lowest proportion with figures varying widely from 106,000 to 131 thousands of private means of transport consumers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... from 11 million vehicles to 13 million ones in 2014, showing an average change arou...
^^^^
Line 4, column 624, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '131 thousand'.
Suggestion: 131 thousand
... figures varying widely from 106,000 to 131 thousands of private means of transport consumers. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, whereas, as regards, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21317829457 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76081111272 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.6861366813 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.142857143 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8571428571 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204371262939 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10063273403 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070408528107 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136049012146 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679208505 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.