The table gives information about the land covered by forests in various countries in 1990 and 2005, with a forecast for 2015
The table provides data on changes of the wood share in four countries in 1990 and 2005 and on the predictions by 2015.
Overall, half of the observed countries faced deforestation, though the rest followed the reverse trend. The ‘greenest’ country was Brazil, regardless the fact that by the end of the period it would have probably lost more than 10% of its forests.
As for details, the positive upward trend was settled by New Zealand and Chile with gradual growth from 28,8 percent to 31 percent and 20,4 to 21,5, respectively. Although these countries were not on the leading position among others, they tended to enlarge the percentage of their land covered with forests. Mulling over the predicted percentage, New Zealand will have 32,3 % and Chile will get additional 0,5%.
The opposite pattern can be observed in Australia and Brazil. Significant reduction of the number of forests shortened the percentage in Brazil from over 62 to nearly 57, whereas in Australia changes were less noticeable (21,3 in 2005 compared to 21,9 in 1990). By the same token, Australia is estimated to continue losing trees and will probably have only 20 percent by 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ably lost more than 10% of its forests. As for details, the positive upward tren...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, as for, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01546391753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65396382744 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639175257732 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2631615658 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189611776353 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698973993845 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709177668633 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117358614711 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069253638536 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.