This table illustrates the percentage of expenditures in three areas (food/drink/tobacco, clothing/footwear and leisure/education) in five countries (Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey) in 2012.
This table illustrates the percentage of expenditures in three areas (food/drink/tobacco, clothing/footwear and leisure/education) in five countries (Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey) in 2012.
Overall, citizens of all listed countries spent considerably more amount of money on food, drink and tobacco then on leisure and education. In addition, Turkey had a higher spending in every category than others countries in 2012.
With regards to food, drink and tobacco consumption, Turkey and Ireland held leading position (about 30%) and outnumbered Sweden and Italy almost twice.
In terms of clothing and footwear category, there were more spending in Italy (9%). Ireland, Sweden and Turkey spent around 6,5%, and the least amount of money spent in Spain 5.4% in the given year.
The smallest expenditures were in leisure/education area. Most of all spent Turkish 6.63% on the contrary to Spanish and Irish, who were spending just 1.98% and 2.21% retrospectively. Citizens of Italy and Sweden were in the middle and spent the similar percentage of expenditures about 3.3% each.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... had a higher spending in every category than others countries in 2012. With re...
^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en and Italy almost twice. In terms of clothing and footwear category, there we...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entage of expenditures about 3.3% each.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51204819277 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2348948865 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8968711044 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537404099251 0.215688989381 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221336392357 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.281670327519 0.0843802449381 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3326660786 0.15604864568 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.334267751694 0.0819641961636 408% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.