The table show the results of surveys in a European country, carried out in three different years.
Percentage of respondents expressing interest in certain sports
The table compares the percentage of people interested in different sports in Europe in three years, namely 1999, 2004 and 2009.
In general, there were significant changes in the proportion of respondents interest in various sports, except for swimming and tennis. In particular, the figure for football was highest in comparison with any other sports over the period shown.
In 1999, 54% of people were interested in football, more than 22% and 30% compared to cycling and tennis orderly. At the same time, the percentage of people interested in swimming stood at 10%, while the figures for volleyball and rugby were lower, at the same percentage (8%).
Between 1999 and 2009, the UK saw a significant fall of 2% in the proportion of respondents interested in football and it continued to decline by 2% at the end of the period. Similarly, that of cycling had a similar trend, with the figure decreasing to 28%; however, this figure rose to 30% in 2009.
On the other hand, those of volleyball and rugby increased to 13% and 17% respectively from 1999 to 2009. Finally, the figures for tennis and swimming remained almost unchanged in the same period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y other sports over the period shown. In 1999, 54% of people were interested in ...
^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e were interested in football, more than 22% and 30% compared to cycling and tenn...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, similarly, so, while, except for, in general, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94871794872 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71134175197 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3508711224 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140333337363 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638885660469 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871328666646 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975990419632 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103107819946 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.