The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
(Figures are in millions of dollars)
The table illustrates how much money was donated by charities in the US, EU and other countries to assist several nations in terms of technological development between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the total aid given to technological support increased over the period given. It is also observed that the USA donation was considerably greater than that from any other country.
In 2006, A total aid of $15.7 millions was given to support the technology, which continued to rise to $24.4 millions two years later. Followingly, the aid suffered a mild decrease to $23.5 million before climbing to a new high of $28.1 million in 2010. US charities stood out as the leading position with a rise in the aid from $9.8 million in 2006 to $20.3 millions.
Likewise, contributions from the EU and other countries also witnessed a significant increase. Donations from EU charities grew from $3.1 millions in 2006 to $3.6 millions in 2009, rising steadily to $4.1 millions in the following year. Following the similar pattern, the charities in other countries gave $2.8 millions and the aid then rose slowly to $3.5 millions in 2008. At the end of the period, the donation reached a peak of $3.7 millions after a drop in the previous year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | Chu Thị Hải | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 67
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 wo 84
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate Write a report for a 89
- Due to so many young people dropping out from schools the rate of unemployment is increasing and it affects our society in different ways In your opinion how can this situation be improved Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther country. In 2006, A total aid of 5.7 millions was given to support the te...
^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... out as the leading position with a rise aid of .8 million in 2006, Likewise,...
^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the leading position with a rise aid of .8 million in 2006, Likewise, contrib...
^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...006, Likewise, contributions from the EU and other countries also witnessed a ...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to .6 millions in 2009, rising steadily to .1 millions in the following year. Fo...
^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ached a peak of .7 millions after a drop in the previous year.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81642512077 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79659661869 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541062801932 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1764359054 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46902453546 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190267332377 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109621622153 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275061898803 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911683781373 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.