The table shows the export values of various products in 1997 and 2010.
The table illustrates the amount of money received from the export of five different products in two years, 1997 and 2010. Units are measured in HK billion dollars.
Overall, it can be seen that the exports values experienced an upward trend from 1997 to 2010 but the opposite was true for the figures for clothing and manufacturing. It is also noticeable that changes in metals accounted for the largest percentage of those exported products.
In 1997, exporting equipment made up a third of the total export earnings ( 10.3 billion), followed by telecommunity (7.9 billion). In the course of thirteen years, it increased to 11.6 billion while the figure for telecommunity had a more significant rise of 4.8 billion. Metal export values was the lowest, comprised only 2.3 billion but then jumped to 5.1 billion in 2010 and received 122% growth which is the highest among six products.
Regarding clothing and manufacturing, their numbers were quite similar, standing at 6 billion and 5.5 billion in 1997 respectively before dropping to 5 billion and 4 billion in turn at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... up a third of the total export earnings 10.3 billion, followed by telecommunity ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00549450549 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80194461257 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1004338374 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227967144581 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1077152634 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101634597491 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150934313058 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835088227453 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.