The table shows the figure for imprisonment in thousands in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
The bar chart compares the number of people in prison in five different countries over a period of 50 years from 1930 to 1980.
A perusal of the graph indicates that Canada and United States are the only two countries for greater figures of imprisonment in each year. On the other hand, Great Britain had lowest number of prisoners for the majority of the period. In Canada, up to 120 thousand people were imprison in starting year 1930. However, in US and New Zealand, the numbers were stagnant of 100 thousand in same year. While in Australia and Great Britain had less figure of nearly 70 thousand and 30 thousand in 1930. Furthermore, the figures soared to around 130 thousand in US in year 1940. While the numbers were fluctuated down in the Canada, New Zealand and Australia. There is no change in the Great Britain in 1940. In the US, numbers were slightly dropped to almost 100 thousand in 1950 and there is steady increment in the Great Britain of 40 thousand while other countries were remain unchanged in the same year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
... year. On the other hand, Great Britain had lowest number of prisoners for the majority of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd in 1950 and there is steady increment in the Great Britain of 40 thousand whil...
^^
Line 2, column 869, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... 40 thousand while other countries were remain unchanged in the same year.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65027322404 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39846517457 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51912568306 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0571552838 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251784529029 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103090781281 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721435461163 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194727181981 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147382631694 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.