The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The purpose of this report is to provide information about how the forest area in each continent around the world had changed over 15 years, between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, the vast majority of the table showed fluctuations over the period, with a significant upward trend in Europe; however, Africa and South America's evergreen land experienced a moderate decrease.
As demonstrated in the figure, Europe, with the highest proportion of a greenwood land around the world, exhibited the most significant change. The forested land there increased considerably from 989 million hectares to 1001 million hectares by 2005. Nevertheless, South American, which accounted for the second-highest, decrease steadily from 946 to 882 million hectares of forested land over the same period. Similarly, Africa faced a slight decline from 749 million in 1990 to 691 million in 2005.
Focusing on the remaining continents, namely Asia, North American and Oceania, each country 's wild jungle site remained stable between 1990 and 2005 as shown in the given table. With regard to the table, a small fluctuation occurred in Asia; however, the rest did indicate any relatively similar experience.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42162162162 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8212073839 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8245602987 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189631483395 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829439557526 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664913742842 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974038006272 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705931725833 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42162162162 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8212073839 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8245602987 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189631483395 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829439557526 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664913742842 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974038006272 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705931725833 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.