The presented table indicates how employee and factory dimension of England and Wales silk industry varied from 1851 to 1901.
Overall, there were more women working in silk generation than men during the period. In addition, while the number of factories was upgraded, a downward trend was witnessed in that of total employees.
Turning into detail, in 1851, in comparison to male workers, who had 53.964 individuals, the figure for female counterparts was significantly higher, with 76.786. Over the next 5 decades, the former decreased gradually to 13.375, whereas the latter also dropped steadily to more than 25 thousand in 1901. As a result, starting at 130.750 people in 1851, there was a considerable decline by more than two thirds to 38.943 in the entire employees.
Regarding to the remaining category, there were exactly 272 silk factories across the territories in 1851. Twenty years later, the number grew remarkably to reach the peak of 761, before slightly reducing to 693 industrial units. Throughout the remainders of the period, despite a fluctuation, the figure was always kept above 620 factories, and generally fell to 623 in 1901.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies, and generally fell to 623 in 1901.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, third, whereas, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26344086022 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75760334865 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9314307404 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179570129013 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718999196783 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800528153473 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125825916037 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937494224035 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.