The table demonstrates the percentage of school children Attending Four different types Secondary School between 2000 and 2009. Overall, it is clear that Secondary School Attendance in Specialist Schools are very low as compared to others like in 2000 it's about 12 percent , and shown a steady fall up to 2 percent till 2009 altogether 10 percent.
In addition, Grammar Schools has shown 24 percent in the year of 2000, but soon after has given fall in attendance of 2005 about 19 percent whereas in 2009 it has the lowest percentage of attendance in 2009 about 12 percent and comparatively having better attendance then Specialist Schools.
In contrast, Voluntary-controlled Schools and Community Schools both are in opposite in terms of attendance, comparatively in the year of 2000 the Voluntary-controlled Schools are at high percentage of 52 percent in attendance whereas the Community Schools are at very low about 12 percent and in the year of 2009 Voluntary-controlled Schools has attendance about 20 percent and the Community Schools has 58 percent of attendance which is good percentage in terms of other Secondary School.
Therefore, Community Schools has played good role in increase the percentage of attendance and the other schools were not able to do it so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... low as compared to others like in 2000 its about 12 percent , and shown a steady f...
^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...others like in 2000 its about 12 percent , and shown a steady fall up to 2 percent...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. In contrast, Voluntary-controlled Schools and Community Schools both are i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, therefore, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23300970874 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33111317228 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45145631068 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.751798481 43.030603864 309% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 215.6 112.824112599 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.2 22.9334400587 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2 5.23603664747 271% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188089257588 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148896212733 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10730607401 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133337981832 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673533639286 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.8 13.2329268293 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.