The table shows the results of survey in a European country which was carried out in three different years . It shows the percentages of people who said that they are interested in certain sports.
The table compares the proportion of people enjoying certain sports in a range of seven distinctive sports in a European nation via a opinion poll conducted at five-years intervals from 1999 to 2009.
It is clear from the shown table that of seven sports, football was by far the most alluring sport in all three years surveyed. While the rate of those responded who enjoyed ruby was much smallest in the first two years, goft attracted the least spectators in the final year surveyed.
In 1999, around 60 per cent of those who took part in the survey enjoyed football, which was the highest percentage of people in comparison with other sports. This number decreased steadily by 10 per cent over the time period until it reached nearly a half in 2009. Similarly, the proportion of those polled who attracted by tennis matches also saw a gradual fall by 1 per cent each year surveyed from 26 per cent in 1999 to 24 percent in the final year.
The figure for cycling, on the other hand, increased slightly by 2 per cent to 34 per cent in 2009. The upward trend also saw in the numbers for volleyball and rubby, where the figures was almost double after 10 years to 24 per cent and 17 per cent, respectively. The percentage of people questioned who are interested in golf also rised slightly from a tenth in the 1999 and 2005 to 13 per cent in the final year. Meanwhile, the number for swimming fluctuated, peaking at 20 per cent in 2004, then fell to just 18 per cent in 2009, which was almost the same as 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...inctive sports in a European nation via a opinion poll conducted at five-years in...
^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...per cent and 17 per cent, respectively. The percentage of people questioned who are...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, similarly, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51449275362 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40217118062 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.304455118 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168326302733 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822155389829 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602270427795 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116889335416 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270118663605 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.