The table shows results of surveys done in in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city. Units are measured in percentage?
The table illustrates the proportion of two experiments done in 1980 and 2010 on numerous types of aspects of a particular city.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is evident that education and employment are the only aspects that improved by 2010. However, the aspects such as health care, environment, shops and transports were better in 1980 than 2010.
In 1980, healthcare was the best aspect which had 82% of good comments on the other hand, by 2010, there was only 74%of decent comments for the healthcare sector. By 2010, 82% of positive comments produced by education aspect which was the best area than the other particular areas. People gave negative comments mostly for transport in both years at around 52% in 1980 and 39% by 2010. Environment had 6% of bad comments and 72% positive comments but by 2010 the bad comments climbed up to 16% and positive approximately remained the same. Shops got same neither good nor bad results (24%) in both years though, by 2010 the positive comments decreased up to 60%. Employment aspect approximately rose by 10% at good and bad comments by 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 10% at good and bad comments by 2010.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6661832782 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537234042553 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1712000856 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176485315384 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934306972865 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592392024975 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160907033214 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616515766132 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.