The table shows a survey of the proportion of adults in California by age group who enjoyed different types of leisure activities in 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where relevant.
The table shows a survey of various sort of leisure activites which are enjoyed of different range of age of adults in Californa in 2011. Over 6 type of activites, watching TV was the most activity that are enjoyed by the majority in California.
As stated before, all age enjoyed watching TV with the highest percentage of 89% from adults over 60s. This popular activity followed by spending time with family/friends, people with age between 18-30 had 58% as the percentage kept decreasing as the people became older. Besides that, group of the same age also enjoy reading with 22%, diversely, they did not really enjoy gardening. In the other hand, the percentage rose to exactly 26% for group of 46-60 and over 60s.
Like reading, listening to music also experienced a similar level of percentage which the highest measurement belong to people with age 18-30. Lastly, adults over 60s showed 0% of interest in playing computer games, while the number increased for group of 18-30, 31-45, and 46-60 ( 15%, 5%, and 2% respectively ).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed for group of 18-30, 31-45, and 46-60 15%, 5%, and 2% respectively .
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and 46-60 15%, 5%, and 2% respectively .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, lastly, really, so, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95402298851 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60820682791 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7521738309 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208623840478 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100857492879 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871756202543 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169416852814 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116523314612 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.