The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland, New Zealand.
The tables give the information on how customers react to the quality of shops and restaurants of a new shopping mall in Auckland, New Zealand while the pie chart describes the satisfaction level of survey participants about the shopping complex’s design.
It is clear that the satisfaction rate of shopper surpassed the satisfaction proportion in all three surveys (shops, restaurants and design).
According to the given illustration, 62% of the male customers said that they were satisfied with the shops’ quality, meanwhile, nearly three quarters of the females were convinced by the stores. Exactly one-fifth of both men and women were dissatisfied with the shops. Turning to the restaurants, a large proportion of the men were happy with the quality of them while a quarter of male was more than satisfied. The objection level of the men about the restaurant was quite ignorable, only 5% to be precise, and this percentage was slightly less than one-fourth of the dissatisfied females with the restaurant quality. Males and females who did not pass comment on shops and restaurants ranged from 9% to 20%.
In the case of the design, a little more than three-fifth of the respondents appeared satisfied, making it the highest total. On the other hand, only 17% of participants seemed very satisfied. Dissatisfied rate stood at 11%, which was just ahead of one with no comment at 10%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13973799127 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00236680663 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8663074702 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163739686361 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561303643782 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127810314671 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12572070351 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180140539159 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.